I did not say otherwise. I asked whether you think it is more likely.
My apologies. When a subtitle is created by a competent subber, this might be the case. If for instance, a particular sub is created by Viki staff subber or subber with solid reputation who also happens to be a native, wouldn’t over-editing affect the accuracy?
As an outsider (an OL moderator stalking the Team Discussions with curiosity), I’ve seen it happen only once or twice. It’s good when the mistake is noticed by the CE. But I assume some are not. Since you yourself are fluent in Korean, you will catch them all.
It’s tricky when some of the members of the English team aren’t fluent in the original language. I suppose that’s when these errors mostly occur.
Yes, and also when some feel that they know the origin language better than others. I know everyone means well when they are editing but with Asian languages, due to the difference in the sentence structure and also heavy reliance on the nuance, when a subtitle is corrected to satisfy an English editor, the meaning sometimes gets lost.
What baffled my mind was that I was informed (by a respected source) that in this specific drama (won’t mention title) they had working there 5 fluent in the Korean language translators. They were also getting paid for their work. I can’t understand if these were paid translators, and they were so fluent in the Korean language; Why the English subtitles were in such terrible condition?
I started blaming the non so proficient English subbers using GT/other translator tools to translate the subs, but as I paid close attention to the drama, and as I heard the actor/actress (with the little Korean I understand) I knew the Dialogue in Korean was not translated accurately enough.
I was wondering why this was happening, and who was to be blamed that started the mess in that drama, and for the first time in my life, I wished with all my heart I knew the Korean language well enough, but sadly I don’t. Once we know the source and cause of the mess in translation, we can fix the problem, but until then, this vicious cycle will continue to play on, and on, in here.
I always mentioned the domino effect; that if one language messes up, and is not caught/fixed on time, the OL will fail to give a good translation no matter how proficient they may be. But I also noticed an ugly pattern here, and that is that certain translators will edit a subtitle although it has been done correctly. This happens in EVERY language specially with some people that have the ‘‘know it all complex,’’ and refuse to accept and respect a good translation done by another person (translator).
We all by now have noticed that, and we have to hope some staff members out there (if there’s any) are taking notice too, and can help out into resolving/fixing this problem. They need to get to the bottom of who is doing what, and why that’s going on so much here lately. I was watching several movies/dramas and there are so many ridiculous things going on in the subtitles. I saw a movie that the ‘‘subber’’ was actually expressing things about the character like writing (jerk) when the character was being mean.
You know how long ago this never happened here at this site? Long time, but now we have a comeback of the subbers adding their own feeling towards certain characters. We all know by now why this is happening here so much BECAUSE there are no consequences for their actions. There are NO one here to report this things. Like I mentioned before the submit button didn’t work when I tried reporting certain things.
I saw in a team 14 EDITORS in Spanish, and they need to fix that PRONTO. The technical department has to make it so that only Editors have access to editing dramas/movies, and Of Course we need to put a limit as to how many Editors a drama should have. Sometimes in life, less is more. It has been proven that too many Editors in dramas/movies, is not the best route to go.
I can totally understand what you’re saying here. I happen to edit the English subtitles of a Thai lakorn as the CE. There had been a couple of sentences that needed to be edited so they could make sense in English. However, I was afraid that my editing would cause a change in the meaning of the sentence. That’s why I asked the TE to check those subtitles again and explain to me what exactly she wanted to convey.
Every language has its idioms and phrases that don’t exist in other languages. Changing those sentences can lead to mistranslation.
In conclusion, I believe that as an English editor (GE or CE) when you come across a subtitle that confuses you, the best thing you can do is open the history under the segment to see how the subtitle came to be like that. If you still can’t understand completely, you should ask the TE. Nobody will criticize you if you make some questions.
I agree with this. If the editors are too many, I think there won’t be consistency in the translation flow. Everyone has their own writing style that appears when they translate a sentence. One editor can correct the subtitles giving them a neutral and word-to-word translation. Another editor can give them a more personal and based-on-meaning translation. That will lead to two different styles of editing and can cause confusion.
Also, if someone from the editing team has the:
all the work from other translators and editors will be wasted.
In my opinion, editors of languages other than English should be one or two. I can accept three if the drama is too long and complicated (like the historical ones).
This is very significant to note. Thanks for your guidance.!
I absolutely agree that the best course of action for editors is to ask when in doubt. It gets a little more tricky when:
- The subber is correct and the TE makes an edit. The TE is not necessarily the strongest subber in the team.
- The subtitle in question appears to have obvious grammatical error but there is a reason why a subber translated a sentence in such way. For example, when you see “this early in the morning”, many editors would be itching to change it to “early this morning” but I assure you there are instances where the former is appropriate.
addictedtobooks
Nobody will criticize you if you make some questions.
That depends a lot on your luck bc we have here many teams that are not receptive to answering questions, helping out others, etc. Some can be really rude and uncooperative bc they suffer from the’’ know it all syndrome’’ just because they have been at this site for many, many years.
Contrary to @choitrio who from day one that she’s been here, she has tried her best to help everyone who asked her questions; within the means that she was able to do so. Her work as a Korean to English is excellent, and I admire her integrity and honesty with everyone. One time she worked in a drama and I was happy with my subs, but more than halfway, the subs in the drama were declining, and I lost interest to keep watching. I don’t remember if I asked her what was going on, but she informed us that she had to stopped working in the drama, and of course, the subtitles were never the same.
Being the sweetheart that she is, she praised the ones working there, and encourage me/us to continue watching (which I did later on). She never boast about her great translations, and give everyone credit for work done. Unlike others that no matter how much effort or how good other team members are, they never will acknowledge it.
You had a great TE in your team that worked with you to give better quality work in the subtitles, but we have here some TEAMS that won’t communicate well with others. In other words; they are not good team players, and as such they create a barriers that causes a lot of mistranslations in the subtitles, and so many more other issues.
That is why I feel that not everyone can be an Editor, and just bc ‘‘maybe’’ they are proficient enough in English, they can be a better TE or CE either. Like a puzzle; to become whole, it needs all its parts in its proper place.
That is one of the main reason why I never volunteered to be an Editor in K-dramas since knowing English doesn’t give me a free pass to Edit dramas. It is also knowing the original language that plays a big role into doing editing work correctly.
When we change something in a dialogue or script, not only we can commit copyrights infringement, but we can also change the meaning of a sentence, and therefore we are making it a wrong sentence. No, thank you. I would never want to be part of something that is so wrong because it takes away the desire from the viewers to watch the drama/movie (it does for me).
I am not very good with compliments, but thank you! Humility is a trait I value highly.
- Always be the first to admit mistake, and be the last to take credit.
- 벼는 익을수록 고개를 숙인다, which loosely translates to “As the crop ripens, it bends its head.” To a humble person, the weight of knowledge should feel heavy.
My kids are probably sick of me repeating these to them.
I’m currently working on a Thai lakorn as a TE. This lakorn actually comes pre-subbed and by the time it gets to me (after seggers etc…) there’s already been some translation editing going on by other members. Personally, I don’t mind. I just do my part as TE. I do check each and every single “pre-subbed” subtitle or edited subs, just to make sure context isn’t lost.
When there’s a phrase, idiom or innuendo that needs more explanation (for OL) I make a T/N. It’s important not to overlook these things because the context can get distorted in editing or OL. Plus, it will confuse the viewers if the translation doesn’t flow smoothly.
Another thing I’ve done was make a note of anything that may need more explanations in the Team Discussions. In the end, it’s up to CE to decide what’s best for the translation.
Communication is key. If you have a good supportive team, anything can be openly discussed. Afterall, as TE, this person’s duty is to make sure the translation is the most accurate in meaning and context.
p.s. When something can’t be literally translated in OL, I provide translation options that will mean the same thing without losing accuracy.
I agree wholeheartedly that communication is the key in any teamwork.
I try to provide T/N for the viewers as well but I also recognize that by doing so the subtitles may become too long or not as esthetically pleasing.
As to posting comments in the Team Discussions, I wonder if there is a way to pin questions “still to be resolved” so that they do not get buried by other comments?
I try to keep T/N very short and concise, about 3-4 words max. I haven’t had to add too many, which is a good thing.
For comments in Team Discussions, I direct it @ a specific member, so that they can look at it right away. So far, I’ve only mentioned the CE & GE. For us, who are TE these are the only two people that we will work closely with most of the time. In general, if you’re unsure just direct it at the CE since they have the final word (in editing). They will be the one to work it out with whomever may be causing trouble or need the heads up.
You have a point there. Most of the time it’s the combination of asking and taking a look at the History.
I can see clearly the difference in those two phrases; the first one puts emphasis that it’s too early while the other one lacks it. I know it’s wrong to rephrase it because when I translated it into Greek (my native language), they were two different phrases.
Sometimes when I edit and I’m not sure if it should be rephrased, I translate the subtitle into Greek in order to understand the meaning better.
I wholeheartedly agree with you regarding @choitrio. I had the pleasure to work with her on a project, and I hope it won’t be the last one.
I was one of the GEs and although my assigned part was time-consuming and exhausting due to the duration, her TE work made it so much easier to check it.
You don’t know how much I wished she could be more active (working) in dramas here, but I understand her limitations working here since it requires too much time, and the work involved is no joke.
Some people may feel I like to criticize here too much, but I feel that if we don’t call certain things to the attention on time, it might get out of hand. Lately, I felt the subtitles were getting to a very critical point; so I made my mission to give a shout out about it, and hoping that in the process we could get back on track with the quality subtitles we always had at this site.
The thing for me is that good subtitles in dramas/movies is what keep my interest in watching the drama/movie. I also have to point out that is not the word [ANYWAYS] that drove me to this, but the fact that I didn’t feel the love and pride we always had in the RViki subtitles.
Something was getting lost here, and it needed to be brought back to its rightful place.
If some people choose to dislike/hate me, so be it. I don’t pay my rent or bills with their money, so I don’t need them in my life because the ones that I need in my life, are those that want me in theirs. I even feel that racism is playing a big part on all this animosity towards my person, and is sad to think that going through all we’re going through now, we still have people here with such a terrible thing embedded in their heart.
Let’s all work together as a TEAM and make sure that accuracy in the translation don’t get lost when the EDITING is done. Don’t need to be perfect just as good as it can be.
What about using Timed Comments for that? I know not all viewers have them on, but some might actually turn them on for that.
That might not work, especially with translating into other languages. In an older drama I saw a subtitle with the note ‘other subbers, please read the timed comments’. In the TC, the subber gave the explanation that in Korean a tongue twister was used and instead of translating she replaced it with a tongue twister in English.
I checked a few other languages and some subbers read and understood the TC and replaced the English tongue twister into one in their own language. Subbers from other languages just literally translated the English tongue twister into their own language (so it no longer was one) and then also translated ‘other subbers, please read the timed comments’ in their language.